Community Managed Forest Groups and Preferences for REDD+ Contract Attributes: A Choice Experiment Survey of Communities in Nepal

Authors

  • Sahan T.M. Dissanayake Colby College and Portland State University
  • Prakash Jha University of Venice Ca Foscari-Italy and Forest Action-Nepal
  • Bhim Adhikari IDRC-Canada Forest Action-Nepal
  • Rajesh Bista Portland State University
  • Randall Bluffstone Portland State University-USA and ForestAction-Nepal
  • Harisharan Luintel Portland State University-USA and Forest Action-Nepal
  • Peter Martinsson University of Gothenburg-Sweden
  • Eswaran Somanathan Forest Action-Nepal
  • Michael Toman Indian Statistical Institute
  • Naya Sharma Paudel The World Bank-Washington DC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v13i1.15362

Keywords:

REDD, Community forestry, Nepal, Choice experiment, Interaction terms

Abstract

A significant portion of the world’s forests that are eligible for Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) payments are community managed forests. At the same time, there is a little knowledge in the existing literature about the preferences of households in the communities with community managed forests for REDD+ contracts.We use a choice experiment survey of rural communities in Nepal to understand the respondent’s preferences towards the institutional structure of REDD+ contracts. We split our sample across the communities with community managed forests groups and those without to see how the prior involvement in community managed forest groups’ impact preferences. Results show that respondents care about how the payments are divided between the households and the communities, the restrictions on firewood use, the restrictions on grazing and the level of payments. Finally we use a series of demographic interactions terms to analyze how the institutional arrangements and beliefs about climate change and benefits from the REDD+ program influence respondents’ beliefs. We find that there are no significant differences in the preferences for the REDD+ contract attributes between the Community Forests (CF) and non-CF respondent groups but we find that respondent groups differ in their beliefs about REDD+ payments and the institutional arrangements.

Journal of Forest and Livelihood 13(1) May, 2015, Page : 8-19

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
822
PDF
821

Downloads

Published

2016-07-27

How to Cite

Dissanayake, S. T., Jha, P., Adhikari, B., Bista, R., Bluffstone, R., Luintel, H., Martinsson, P., Somanathan, E., Toman, M., & Paudel, N. S. (2016). Community Managed Forest Groups and Preferences for REDD+ Contract Attributes: A Choice Experiment Survey of Communities in Nepal. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 13(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v13i1.15362

Issue

Section

Articles