Marxist Legacy in Agriculture: A Comparative Analysis of Land Reforms in Cuba, China, and Vietnam

Authors

  • Rajan Binayek Pasa Lecturer at Central Department of Rural Development Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu
  • Hem Raj Joshi Department of Agriculture Extension and Rural Sociology Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, PG
  • Chuda Dhakal Department of Statistics, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science
  • Chiranjibi Dhakal Corresponding Author, Lecturer at Gramin Adarsha Multiple Campus Nepal Tar, Tarakeshwor, Kathmandu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/rnjds.v7i1.86324

Keywords:

Marxism, wealth redistribution, land reforms, collectivization

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of land reforms in Cuba, China, and Vietnam through the lens of Marxist agrarian theory. Utilizing a comparative historical methodology, this library based study conducts a qualitative documentary analysis of secondary sources, including government reports and academic literature, triangulated with quantitative data on agricultural output. This approach facilitates a systematic examination of how core Marxist principles—such as the abolition of feudal-capitalist structures, collectivization, and wealth redistribution—were adapted to distinct national contexts to empower rural populations and achieve socio-economic justice. The analysis reveals that while all three cases successfully established a foundation for poverty reduction, food security, and economic sovereignty by dismantling historical inequities, their long-term efficacy was contingent on pragmatic adaptations. China’s “Post-collectivization Household Responsibility System” and Vietnam’s market-oriented “Doi Moi” reforms catalyzed unprecedented growth, though often at socio-environmental cost. Conversely, Cuba’s agroecological focus ensured food security despite constraints. The study concludes that sustainable agrarian transformation requires moving beyond rigid ideological models. Instead, it necessitates a hybrid governance framework that strategically get hitched Marxist concerns for equity with market mechanisms for efficiency. This is best achieved by ensuring secure, transferable land-use rights for smallholders, providing targeted state support, and integrating environmental stewardship and agroecological practices from the outset to ensure both productive and equitable outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
12
PDF
1

Downloads

Published

2024-12-01

How to Cite

Pasa, R. B., Joshi, H. R., Dhakal, C., & Dhakal, C. (2024). Marxist Legacy in Agriculture: A Comparative Analysis of Land Reforms in Cuba, China, and Vietnam . Research Nepal Journal of Development Studies, 7(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.3126/rnjds.v7i1.86324

Issue

Section

Articles