Impact of Behavioral Biases on Nepalese Mutual Fund Investment Decisions: The Mediating Role of Risk Perception

Authors

Keywords:

herding, investment, mutual funds, overconfidence, psychological biases, risk perception, herding, investment, mutual funds, overconfidence, psychological biases, risk perception

Abstract

This study examines how behavioural biases- overconfidence and herding- influence investor choices in Nepalese mutual funds and investigates whether risk perception mediates the relationships between these biases and mutual fund investment decisions. Using a quantitative, explanatory research design, data were systematically collected through survey questionnaires from 386 active market participants, and subsequently analysed in SPSS 27 and RStudio to examine relationships and test hypotheses. The findings indicate that both overconfidence and herding biases significantly and positively drive mutual fund investment choices. Risk perception acts as a mediating factor, partially elucidating the mechanisms through which each bias influences mutual fund investment decisions. The research highlights the need for investor education and behaviour-based strategies to promote better risk awareness and more rational diversified investment choices.

Abstract
0
PDF
0

Author Biographies

Kamal Bahadur Koirala, Tribhuvan University

Assistant Professor, Patan Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University

Chintamani Gautam, Tribhuvan University, Public Youth Campus

Assistant Professor, Public Youth Campus, Tribhuvan University

Downloads

Published

2025-08-01

How to Cite

Koirala, K. B., & Gautam, C. (2025). Impact of Behavioral Biases on Nepalese Mutual Fund Investment Decisions: The Mediating Role of Risk Perception . PYC Nepal Journal of Management, 18(1), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.3126/pycnjm.v18i1.97075

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Koirala, K. B., & Gautam, C. (2025). Impact of Behavioral Biases on Nepalese Mutual Fund Investment Decisions: The Mediating Role of Risk Perception . PYC Nepal Journal of Management, 18(1), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.3126/pycnjm.v18i1.97075