Experience of clinicians with dual bronchodilator therapy in COPD (EXPAND) in Nepal

Authors

  • Ramesh Chokhani Department of Pulmonary, Critical care and Sleep Medicine, Norvic International Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Sanjeet Krishna Shrestha Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Nepal Mediciti Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal
  • Sharad Bhattarai Birtacity Hospital, Birtamod, Nepal
  • Aniruddha Mukhopadhyay Global Medical Affairs, Cipla Ltd, Mumbai, India
  • Vaibhav Gaur Global Medical Affairs, Cipla Ltd, Mumbai, India
  • Jaideep Gogtay Global Medical Affairs, Cipla Ltd, Mumbai, India

Keywords:

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Bronchodilators, Inhaler Techniques, Formoterol, Tiotoprium

Abstract

Introduction: Combination of bronchodilators, particularly long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting β2 agonists (LABAs) have become the mainstay of pharmacological therapy for COPD. COPD is now a common non communicable disease in Nepal.

Objective: The study evaluated the current perception and experience of the clinicians in Nepal on  diagnosis and management of COPD with focus on use of dual bronchodilator therapy.

Method: This cross-sectional, observational survey evaluated experiences of clinicians (n=96; pulmonologist-13, physician-57, general practitioner-26) in Nepal on diagnosis, management trends, and current perceptions on the use of dual bronchodilator therapy in COPD management.

Result: 93% of clinicians were practising in an urban setting for an average of 10 years and an average of 35% of their patients are of COPD. 61% of clinicians use mMRC with (34%) or without (27%) CAT score. 92% of clinicians perceived that most of their patients had 1 (32%) or >1 (59%) exacerbation/year. 54% of clinicians performed spirometry on all their patients with suspected COPD. 49% of clinicians measured blood EOS in their patients with severe COPD before adding ICS. 93% of clinicians preferred dual therapy (separate inhalers or a combination) for their COPD patients, but 83% of clinicians preferred LABA + LAMA in a single inhaler over inhalers given separately. 57% of clinicians preferred LABA + LAMA and 82% preferred the Tiotropium + Formoterol combination. 81% of clinicians stepped up or stepped down their treatment. 56% of patients were taking LABA + LAMA + ICS and 55% of clinicians co-prescribed ICS + LABA with LABA + LAMA. 80% of clinicians checked the inhalation technique at every visit and an average of 54% of their COPD patients were adherent (>80%) to the prescribed inhalation therapy. 78% of clinicians felt that dryness of mouth was the most common side effect of LABA + LAMA. 94% of clinicians believed that managing COPD better could improve cardiovascular outcomes in their patients with coexistent COPD.

Conclusion: In the EXPAND survey, Formoterol + Tiotropium was preferred by most clinicians in Nepal amongst the LABA + LAMA combination. There is a good scope for improvement in the utilization of tools like spirometry, mMRC, CAT, and blood EOS in the daily practice of clinicians in Nepal.

Abstract
169
PDF
0

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Chokhani, R., Shrestha, S. K., Bhattarai, S., Mukhopadhyay, A., Gaur, V., & Gogtay, J. (2023). Experience of clinicians with dual bronchodilator therapy in COPD (EXPAND) in Nepal. Nepalese Respiratory Journal, 2(2), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.3126/nrj.v2i2.69201

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Chokhani, R., Shrestha, S. K., Bhattarai, S., Mukhopadhyay, A., Gaur, V., & Gogtay, J. (2023). Experience of clinicians with dual bronchodilator therapy in COPD (EXPAND) in Nepal. Nepalese Respiratory Journal, 2(2), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.3126/nrj.v2i2.69201