CRPP for Extension Type III Supracondylar Fracture of Humerus by Lateral versus Crossed K Wires – a Comparative Hospital Based Study

Authors

  • Samir K C Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Services Nepal Armed Police Force Hospital, Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal
  • Ishwar Sharma Kandel Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Services, Gandaki Medical College, Pokhara, Gandaki, Nepal
  • Bhola Shrestha Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Services, Gandaki Medical College, Pokhara, Gandaki, Nepal
  • Krishna Bahadur Bista Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Services, Gandaki Medical College, Pokhara, Gandaki, Nepal
  • Rabi Mohan Dhakal Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Services, Gandaki Medical College, Pokhara, Gandaki, Nepal
  • Pravakar Parajuli Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Services, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Bagmati, Nepal
  • Debesh Shrestha Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Services, District Hospital Sankhuwasabha, Province 1, Nepal
  • Sailendra Kumar Duwal Shrestha Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Services, Nepal Armed Police Force Hospital, Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal
  • Prabin Nepal Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Services, Nepal Armed Police Force Hospital, Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal
  • Netra Bahadur Karki Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Services, Nepal Armed Police Force Hospital, Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal

Keywords:

Supracondylar fracture, crossed-K wires, Lateral-K wires

Abstract

Background: SCFH accounts for sixty percent of all fractures around elbow. Type III SCFH is unstable. CRPP is
treatment of choice. Both the crossed-k wires and lateral-entry k wires have been used successfully; however, superiority
has not been established. This study compares stability, functional outcomes, radiological outcomes and complications of
these two methods.
Methods: This is a hospital based prospective comparative study undertaken at GMCTH from June 2019 to November
2020. Fifty-six children of three to thirteen years with extension type III SCFH were included after taking informed
consent. Ethical clearance was taken from NHRC, Kathmandu. Patients were followed up for three months. Statistical
analysis was done using SPSS 25 and p value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results: The average age of participants was 7.70 years. There were 15 girls (26.7%) and 41 boys (73.3%). Right sided
injuries occurred in 32.1% of children with 78.6% sustaining injury on the non-dominant side. Mean duration of fracture
healing was 4.75 weeks. Average Baumann’s angle at three completed months in lateral-entry group was 75.04 degrees
and crossed-K wires was 74.50 degrees (p=0.374). The average carrying angle in lateral-entry group was 7.79 and
crossed-K wires was 7.29 degrees (p=0.303). Average loss of flexion in lateral-entry group was 2.71 degrees and 2.25
degrees in crossed-K wires (p=0.479). Average loss of extension in lateral-entry group was 3.39 degrees and crossed-K
wires was 2.82 degrees (p=0.37). Skaggs et al Criteria for grading loss of reduction showed no loss of reduction in all
fifty-six cases.
Conclusion: Both the lateral and cross pinning techniques are equally efficient in maintaining reduction in management
of supracondylar fracture of humerus. The ulnar nerve injury can be avoided while using the medial K wire by pinning in
a semi-flexed elbow with ulnar nerve rolled back.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
3
PDF
0

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

K C, S., Sharma Kandel, I., Shrestha, B., Bista, K. B., Dhakal, R. M., Parajuli, P., … Karki, N. B. (2022). CRPP for Extension Type III Supracondylar Fracture of Humerus by Lateral versus Crossed K Wires – a Comparative Hospital Based Study. Journal of Karnali Academy of Health Sciences, 5(3). Retrieved from https://nepjol.info/index.php/jkahs/article/view/86557

Issue

Section

Original Articles