Anterior Cervical Microdiscectomy and Fusion: A Single Center Study with Management and Outcomes

Authors

  • Daniel Encarnacion Santos Department of Neurosurgery of People of Friendship University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Murat Pachev Department of Neurosurgery, City Clinical Hospital №68 Gbuz Gkb Im. V.P. Demikhova
  • Eugeny Shestov Department of Neurosurgery, City Clinical Hospital №68 Gbuz Gkb Im. V.P. Demikhova
  • Ismail Bozkurt Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Park Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
  • Jorge Jimenez-Alvarez Department of Neurosurgery of People of Friendship University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Jose de la Fuente-Hernandez Department of Neurosurgery of People of Friendship University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Gennady Chmutin Department of Neurosurgery of People of Friendship University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Egor Chmutin Department of Neurosurgery of People of Friendship University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Bipin Chaurasia Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Clinic, Birgunj, Nepal
  • Kivanc Yangi Department of Neurosurgery, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/egn.v6i01.93773

Keywords:

ACDF, Cervical Stenosis, Cage, Microdicectomy and outcomes

Abstract

Background: Cervical spondylosis surgery can be performed through two primary approaches: anterior and posterior. The initial anterior approaches were reported by Robinson and Smith in the mid-1930s, followed by Cloward (1958). The aim, based on the placement of the cage within the intervertebral space and the stabilization offered by the plate, was assessed to determine its impact on enhancing postoperative cervical spine dynamics.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken on 21 patients (9 male and 11 female) in the age range of 28 to 66 years old to explore variations in postoperative outcomes among patients who underwent anterior cervical microdiscectomy and fusion with a cage. The research was done between January 2023 and November 2024.

Results: We performed a retrospective observational analysis of N=20 patients who matched our inclusion criteria, and we included 9 men and 11 females, aged between 28 and 66 years, with N=7 patients with left radiculopathy for (35%) and N=10 patients with right radiculopathy for (50%). while N=3 patients exhibited symptoms of radiculopathy or numbness. (15%).

Conclusion: In our study, the position of the cage in the intervertebral space and the fixation supplied by the plate were analyzed to assess their impact on improving the dynamics of the postoperative cervical spine. The postoperative outcomes include reduction of the C6 vertebral dislocation and anterior cervical fusion at C6-C7 utilizing the IRENE cage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
32
2.pdf
9

Downloads

Published

2026-05-05

How to Cite

Encarnacion Santos , D., Pachev , M., Shestov , E., Bozkurt, I., Jimenez-Alvarez , J., Fuente-Hernandez , J. de la, … Yangi, K. (2026). Anterior Cervical Microdiscectomy and Fusion: A Single Center Study with Management and Outcomes. Eastern Green Neurosurgery, 6(01), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.3126/egn.v6i01.93773

Issue

Section

Original Articles