Time to Review and Revise the Peer Review Process: A Critique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/jpan.v10i2.49006Keywords:
Peer-review, retraction, scientific publishing, biomedical ethicsAbstract
Biomedical publishing is valuable as it is the process of disseminating novel and valuable scientific information. The publication of an article relies mainly on the peer review process that has been regarded as a gold standard for a long time. Despite being successful, the process has had a fair share of criticism. There is a need for considering some reforms in terms of transparency, accountability, and quality for this process. In this review, we aim to bring forward some criticism and provide recommendations for improvement of the peer-review process.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Psychiatrists' Association of Nepal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.