Transaction Costs and Common Property Forest Management: Empirical Evidence from Nepal

Authors

  • Bhim Adhikari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v4i1.59769

Keywords:

Transaction cost, common property, forest management, stakeholders, decision making-equity, decision-making equity

Abstract

Transaction costs are an important determinant in the success or failure of community-based resource management. In particular, they can affect participation in management activities, with the poor bearing a proportionally larger share of the costs. Analysis of 309 households from the Middle-Hills of Nepal reveals that transaction costs for communal forest management as a percentage of total costs are higher for poorer households (14%) than those for middle-wealth (12%) or rich households (9%). Whilst transfer of forest management responsibility to the community may lower transaction costs incurred by the state, these costs may be unequally distributed among stakeholders. This paper argues that an adequate theory of forest use should incorporate the role of institutional structures associated with different forest regimes and their associated transaction costs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
10
PDF
19

Downloads

Published

2004-12-31

How to Cite

Adhikari, B. (2004). Transaction Costs and Common Property Forest Management: Empirical Evidence from Nepal. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 4(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v4i1.59769

Issue

Section

Articles