Exclusion Isn’t Easy: Lessons from a Leasehold Forest

Authors

  • Christopher Thoms
  • Mukunda Karmacharya
  • Birendra Karna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v2i2.59724

Keywords:

leasehold forestry, exclusion, collective action, poverty alleviation, devolution

Abstract

Nepal’s Hills Leasehold Forestry and Forage Development Project leases forestland to small, organized groups of rural households. Effective community management of forestland requires the capacity to exclude other potential resource claimants. Through institutional analysis of a single leasehold forest case study, we argue that exclusion by small groups is difficult, especially for the poorest of the poor. We recommend ensuring adequate provisions for meeting the forest product needs of the poorest within the context of community forestry as a more effective poverty alleviation and conservation strategy. In addition to community forestry-based forest access, poor farmers need a leasehold program for farmland that would enable food self-sufficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
35
PDF
35

Downloads

Published

2003-12-31

How to Cite

Thoms, C. ., Karmacharya, M. ., & Karna, B. . (2003). Exclusion Isn’t Easy: Lessons from a Leasehold Forest. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 2(2), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v2i2.59724

Issue

Section

Articles