Collaborative Forest Management in Nepal: Tenure, Governance and Contestations

Authors

  • Sindhu P. Dhungana REDD Implementation Centre, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation
  • Poshendra Satyal School of International Development, University of East Anglia
  • Nagendra P. Yadav Freelance Forestry Consultant
  • Bhola Bhattarai School of Education, Kathmandu University, Lalitpur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v15i1.23084

Keywords:

Benefit sharing, collaborative forest management, forest governance, tenure, Terai

Abstract

 Collaborative forest management (CFM) is a ‘community-based’ forest tenure regime that works in partnership between the central government, local government and local forest user groups in Nepal’s Terai, particularly in the management of large, contiguous forests. It has been in practice since the early 2000s in the form of ‘pilot initiatives’ and is gradually receiving greater legal attention. Through our own experiences, available literature and review of policies, we document the evolutionary history of Terai forest and CFM’s current issues. We found that the management aspects of Terai forests have been weak throughout its history. We also found a number of issues and challenges in the implementation of CFM. Some of the prominent issues include ambiguity in tenure rights and security, lack of appropriate and uncontested policy provisions for cost and benefit sharing among collaborators, limited decision-making space for forest-managing communities and local governments, and limited capacity of collaborators for the productive management of forests. We suggest tenure reform in terms of legal, institutional, technical and financial arrangements, so as to make CFM an effective forest management model in the Terai.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
545
pdf
657

Downloads

Published

2017-09-04

How to Cite

Dhungana, S. P., Satyal, P., Yadav, N. P., & Bhattarai, B. (2017). Collaborative Forest Management in Nepal: Tenure, Governance and Contestations. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 15(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v15i1.23084

Issue

Section

Articles