Between Scylla and Charybdis: academic publishing during the ongoing pandemic

Authors

  • Pathiyil Ravi Shankar

Keywords:

Academic publishing; COVID-19; Peer review; Quality; Timeliness.

Abstract

The ongoing coronavirus pandemic has led to an increased volume of submissions. Many journals have special issues and accelerated peer review for these articles. Maintaining the speed and rigor of the process during the pandemic can be challenging. There have been prominent retractions, predatory journals may have exploited the situation and topics other than the pandemic may be neglected. Peer reviewers are overworked and are also busy providing patient care. We should navigate carefully between ensuring timely publication and ensuring the quality of the published manuscripts. In this article I put forward twelve suggestions to support this process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
84
pdf
93

Downloads

Published

2022-03-15

How to Cite

Shankar, P. R. (2022). Between Scylla and Charybdis: academic publishing during the ongoing pandemic . Journal of Chitwan Medical College, 12(1), 136–138. Retrieved from https://nepjol.info/index.php/JCMC/article/view/43793

Issue

Section

Viewpoint