Comparison of Sediment Rating Curve Developed by Using KNN, SVM and Random Forest Method for Gandaki River Basin, Nepal

Authors

  • Kamal Katwal National College of Engineering, Lalitpur, Nepal
  • Sudeep Thapa Kantipur Engineering College, Lalitpur, Nepal
  • Dipendra Bajracharya Kantipur Engineering College, Lalitpur, Nepal
  • Gaurab Ranjit Kantipur Engineering College, Lalitpur, Nepal
  • Isha Karna Kantipur Engineering College, Lalitpur, Nepal
  • Bishal Pudasaini Kantipur Engineering College, Lalitpur, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/injet.v3i1.87131

Keywords:

sediment rating curve, machine learning, suspended sediment load, seasonal hydrology, Himalayan rivers, discharge-sediment relationship, KNN regression, support vector machine, random forest, Gandaki basin

Abstract

Accurate estimation of suspended sediment load (SSL) is crucial for effective water resource management in Nepal's monsoon-influenced Himalayan River systems, where traditional sediment rating curves (SRCs) often fail to capture complex, non-linear discharge-sediment relationships. This study developed season-specific sediment rating curves for Station 430.5 on the Seti-Gandaki River using three machine learning algorithms: K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF) to address the limitations of conventional power-law approaches across Nepal's four distinct hydrological seasons. Daily discharge and suspended sediment concentration data from 2004-2017 were analyzed to characterize seasonal variability, with monsoon periods exhibiting peak flows exceeding 1,400 m³/s and sediment concentrations reaching over 20,000 ppm, contrasting sharply with winter baseflow conditions below 35 m³/s and sediment concentrations under 250 ppm. Model performance was evaluated using coefficient of determination (R²) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), revealing optimal algorithm selection varied significantly across seasons: KNN demonstrated superior accuracy for monsoon (R² = 0.22) and post-monsoon (R² = 0.97) periods, while SVM showed better performance during winter (R² = 0.81) conditions, though all models struggled with pre-monsoon transitional dynamics (R² < 0.25). The resulting power-law equations—S = 0.85 × Q^1.81 (pre-monsoon), S = 333.66 × Q^0.31 (monsoon), S = 26.55 × Q^0.62 (post-monsoon), and S = 17.61 × Q^0.72 (winter) captured distinct seasonal sediment transport mechanisms, with monsoon conditions presenting the greatest modeling challenges (MAPE = 90.67%) due to complex hysteresis effects, variable sediment availability, and extreme non-linearity that conventional machine learning approaches cannot fully represent. While machine learning models demonstrated substantial improvements over traditional SRCs, particularly during stable post-monsoon and winter periods, the persistent high prediction errors during monsoon conditions highlight the need for advanced deep learning architectures capable of capturing temporal dependencies and multi-factorial sediment transport controls. These findings provide essential foundations for improving sediment load estimation in data-scarce Himalayan basins and inform sustainable water resource management, hydropower planning, and climate adaptation strategies in rapidly changing mountain river systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
0
PDF
0

Downloads

Published

2025-12-24

How to Cite

Katwal, K., Thapa, S., Bajracharya, D., Ranjit, G., Karna, I., & Pudasaini, B. (2025). Comparison of Sediment Rating Curve Developed by Using KNN, SVM and Random Forest Method for Gandaki River Basin, Nepal. International Journal on Engineering Technology, 3(1), 240–270. https://doi.org/10.3126/injet.v3i1.87131

Issue

Section

Articles