Clusivity in Chamling, Bantawa, Bayung and Puma Language

Authors

  • Tara Mani Rai Central Department of Linguistics, TU, Kirtipur, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/tuj.v39i1.66676

Keywords:

Bantawa, Bayung, Chamling, exclusive, inclusive, Puma, typology

Abstract

This paper analyzes clusivity (inclusive and exclusive distinction) in the Kirati languages namely Chamling, Bantawa, Bayung and Puma within the typological framework. The data drawn in this paper were collected from the direct elicitation from the speakers they could represent the languages. The findings reveal that the Kirati languages like Chamling, Bantawa, Bayung and Puma are rich enough in the clusivity as they exhibit inclusive and exclusive distinction in the both dual and plural number. In Bantawa, the marker <-tsi> is realized as the second person dual inclusive marker whereas the marker <-tsija> as the first person dual exclusive marker. The first person plural inclusive is marked by <-n> and <-nka> in the case of the first person plural exclusive in the intransitive verb paradigm. In addition, Puma, Chamling and Bayung also share the first person dual and plural clusivities. The reflexes of the inclusive-exclusive marker may not appear in the same pattern from pronoun to the predicate. Bantawa and Puma have almost the complete copy morphemes that are realized even in the verb conjugation. But the Chamling and Bayung have partial morpheme to denote the clusivity. Typologically observed the Bodish group of the Tibeto-Burman languages, they do not exhibit the way Kirati languages do. For instance, the languages like Gurung, Nar-phu, Dolakha Newar, and Kathmandu Newar have clusivity only in the first-person plural number. Unlike others, Bhujel and Chhantyal have the same marker to indicate the first person inclusive and exclusive marker.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
304
PDF
84

Downloads

Published

2024-06-20

How to Cite

Rai, T. M. (2024). Clusivity in Chamling, Bantawa, Bayung and Puma Language. Tribhuvan University Journal, 39(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.3126/tuj.v39i1.66676

Issue

Section

Articles