Comparative evaluation of smile attractiveness in various orthodontic treatment modalities- A cross-sectional study

Authors

  • Anjali Singh Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, I.T.S. Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Anshul Singla Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, I.T.S. Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Amrita Puri Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, I.T.S. Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Shruti Chaudhary Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, I.T.S. Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Anushriya Dutta Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, I.T.S. Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v12i2.38228

Keywords:

Extraction, Non-extraction, Smile, Facial esthetics, Orthodontic treatment

Abstract

Background: Smile plays a significant role in facial attractiveness and social interactions. The present study aimed to evaluate the smile attractiveness in subjects treated with extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment modality.

Materials and Methods: Frontal smiling photographs of 100 orthodontically treated subjects with an age range of 16-25 years were taken and divided into two groups each having 50 subjects. Group I (ANB 0° to 4° ) was subdivided into cases treated with extraction (group la) and without extraction (group lb). Similarly, Group II (ANB > 4°) was subdivided into cases treated with extraction (group lla) and without extraction (group lib). Smile esthetics and esthetic scores were assessed on frontal smile photographs by using different smile variables objectively and with the help of raters (10 laypersons,10 dental graduates, and 10 orthodontists) subjectively.

Results: In extraction cases, the esthetic scores of dental practitioners and orthodontists were higher than in cases of non-extraction. Between extraction and non-extraction cases, laypeople had no esthetic preference. In Skeletal class I, smile variables such as the arch form index, smile arc and maxillary incisor show had a higher value in extraction cases however, the buccal corridor was more in non-extraction cases. In Skeletal Class II, smile variables such as the maxillary incisor show and arch form index were more in extraction cases and exposure of mandibular teeth was more in non-extraction cases. Judgement given by the raters was mainly based on maxillary incisor show, number of teeth displayed, and buccal corridor ratio. In orthodontic patients treated with and without the extraction, statistically non-significant variations in smile esthetics and esthetic scores were found.

Conclusion: Thus, a decision regarding the extraction of teeth in orthodontic patients should not be solely based on smile esthetics but other factors which determine extraction should be considered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
62
pdf
116

Author Biographies

Anjali Singh, Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, I.T.S. Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, Uttar Pradesh, India

Post Graduate

Anshul Singla, Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, I.T.S. Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, Uttar Pradesh, India

Head of Department

Amrita Puri, Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, I.T.S. Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, Uttar Pradesh, India

Professor

Shruti Chaudhary, Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, I.T.S. Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, Uttar Pradesh, India

Senior Lecturer

Anushriya Dutta, Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, I.T.S. Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, Uttar Pradesh, India

Post graduate

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Singh, A., Singla, A., Puri, A., Chaudhary, S., & Dutta, A. (2022). Comparative evaluation of smile attractiveness in various orthodontic treatment modalities- A cross-sectional study. Orthodontic Journal of Nepal, 12(2), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v12i2.38228

Issue

Section

Original Articles