Comparative Cephalometric Analysis of Angle Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Between Nepalese and Chinese Subjects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v4i1.11306Keywords:
Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion, cephalometry, ethnic variationAbstract
Objective: To identify the craniofacial features of Nepalese and Chinese subjects with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion; andto compare between Nepalese and Chinese samples and Nepalese gender groups.
Materials & Method: The cephalometric radiographs were obtained from 96 Nepalese (mean ages16.34 ± 5.4 years) and 39Chinese (mean age 17.18 ± 7.1 years) subjects with Angle Cass II division 1 malocclusion. Ten skeletal, nine dental and three softtissue variables were investigated.
Result: The craniofacial features between Nepalese and Chinese samples showed significant differences among fifteen of thetwenty-two variables studied; whereas in comparison between gender groups, six parameters were significantly different.
Conclusion: Both samples showed well positioned maxilla, retrusive mandible and Class II skeletal tendency. In comparison,maxilla was more protrusive, mandible was more retrusive and overjet was more increased in Chinese. The Nepalese showedmore prominent nose and chin.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v4i1.11306
Orthodontic Journal of Nepal Vol.4(1) 2014; 17-
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © held by Orthodontic & Dentofacial Orthopedic Association of Nepal
- Copyright on any research article is transferred in full to the Orthodontic & Dentofacial Orthopedic Association of Nepal upon publication in the journal. The copyright transfer includes the right to reproduce and distribute the article in any form of reproduction (printing, electronic media or any other form).
- Articles in the Orthodontic Journal of Nepal are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
- This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.