Pregnancy Outcome in Early versus Late Onset Preeclampsia

Authors

  • Junu Shrestha Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Anjali Subedi Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Eva Gauchan 2Department of Paediatrics, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal
  • Aashika Shrestha Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Chandani Pandey Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/njog.v16i2.42101

Keywords:

early onset, late onset, preeclampsia, pregnancy outcome

Abstract

Aims: To determine the pregnancy outcome of early and late onset preeclampsia.

Methods:  This was a cross sectional analytical study conducted in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Manipal Teaching Hospital from July to October 2021. All cases of preeclampsia diagnosed according to International Society of Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2018, were included. Early and late onset preeclampsia cut-off used was 34 weeks. Preeclampsia diagnosed before 34 were classified as early onset and after 34 weeks as late onset preeclampsia. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21.

Results: The prevalence of early onset and late onset preeclampsia were 4.3% and 8.3% of all deliveries. Early to late onset preeclampsia were 1:2. Renal involvement, placental abruption, IUGR, low birth weight, low Apgar and perinatal morbidity were significantly more in early onset; pre-term labor  and use of MgSO4 and antihypertensives were also more in early onset.

Conclusion: Late onset preeclampsia was more common than early onset preeclampsia but the maternal and perinatal outcome were poor for early onset as compared to late onset preeclampsia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
208
PDF
347

Downloads

Published

2022-01-01

How to Cite

Shrestha, J. ., Subedi, A. ., Gauchan, . E. ., Shrestha, A. ., & Pandey, C. . (2022). Pregnancy Outcome in Early versus Late Onset Preeclampsia. Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 16(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.3126/njog.v16i2.42101

Issue

Section

Original Articles