Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Cardiometabolic Implications

Authors

  • Muneeb Khawar King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Azhar Hafiz Baba University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Rameez Akhtar Luqman International Hospital, Swat, Pakistan
  • Anurag Rawat Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, India
  • Huzaifa Bin Afzaal Rai Medical College, Sargodha, Pakistan
  • Affan Ul Haq King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Mazen Bin Khalid Services Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Anas Ghazi North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Jahanzaib Awan Islamic International Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Beesham Kumar Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Pershan Kumar Jinnah Medical & Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Yamini Saraswathi Gurram Dr. Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Vijayawada, India.

Keywords:

Tirzepatide, Semaglutide, Obesity, Cardiovascular outcomes, Diabetes

Abstract

Background: Obesity and type 2 diabetes are significant global health problems. Tirzepatide, a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, and semaglutide, a selective GLP-1 receptor agonist, are the top incretin therapy options, but their relative effectiveness and safety based on direct head- to -head studies have not been pooled. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide versus semaglutide.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect were searched up to February 2026 to find the articles. Mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) were pooled using a random-effects model and heterogeneity was measured using I².

Results: Three studies were included. Tirzepatide caused significantly greater reduction in weight than semaglutide (pooled MD = −5.19 kg, 95% CI: −7.96 to −2.42; p = 0.0002; I² = 88.5%) and increased the possibility of ≥10% weight loss (pooled RR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.15–1.96; p = 0.0069; I² = 86.3%). No significant difference was observed in any adverse events, or gastrointestinal events; however, there was a greater number of serious adverse events with tirzepatide (RR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.18-2.85; p = 0.007).

Conclusion: Tirzepatide can provide better weight loss than semaglutide with relatively similar safety, except that serious adverse events were more frequent. Studies with long follow-up are required to confirm the cardiovascular safety.

Abstract
336
PDF
1

Downloads

Published

2026-04-02

How to Cite

Khawar, M., Baba, A. H., Akhtar, R., Rawat, A., Afzaal, H. B., Haq, A. U., Khalid, M. B., Ghazi, M. A., Awan, J., Kumar, B., Kumar, P., & Gurram, Y. S. (2026). Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Cardiometabolic Implications. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology, 16(1), 1424-1435. https://doi.org/10.3126/nje.v16i1.92323

Issue

Section

Systematic Reviews

How to Cite

Khawar, M., Baba, A. H., Akhtar, R., Rawat, A., Afzaal, H. B., Haq, A. U., Khalid, M. B., Ghazi, M. A., Awan, J., Kumar, B., Kumar, P., & Gurram, Y. S. (2026). Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Cardiometabolic Implications. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology, 16(1), 1424-1435. https://doi.org/10.3126/nje.v16i1.92323