Understanding significance and p-values

Authors

  • Shrikant I Bangdiwala Professor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/nje.v6i1.14732

Keywords:

p value, significance, American Statistical Association

Abstract

Correction 7th May 2016: p.523, Column 1, second paragraph, line 10 - 'the quantiles at the extremes - say 5%, 1%, which were useful' was changed TO 'the quantiles at the extremes - say 10%, 5%, 2%, and 1%, which were useful'.
p.523, Column 2, second paragraph, line 3 - 'this is misconstrued with 'statistical significance' changed TO 'mistaken with 'statistical significance'.

Since the p-value is a single index, following the ASA’s statement, we strongly support that it cannot and should not be considered as the sole basis for scientific reasoning. Given the misuses and misconceptions concerning p-values, the recommendation is to present the estimate of the effect, provide a measure of uncertainty of the estimation (e.g. confidence interval), and interpret the results in terms of scientific importance. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
1851
PDF
1229

Author Biography

Shrikant I Bangdiwala, Professor

Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Downloads

Published

2016-03-31

How to Cite

Bangdiwala, S. I. (2016). Understanding significance and p-values. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology, 6(1), 522–24. https://doi.org/10.3126/nje.v6i1.14732

Issue

Section

Editorial