Delayed Graft Dislocation After Thoracic Aortic Endovascular Repair

Authors

  • G Piffaretti Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Morphological Sciences, Circolo University Hospital, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese
  • S Negri Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Morphological Sciences, Circolo University Hospital, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese
  • S Ferraro Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Morphological Sciences, Circolo University Hospital, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese
  • M Bossi Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Morphological Sciences, Circolo University Hospital, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese
  • N Rivolta Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Morphological Sciences, Circolo University Hospital, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese
  • F Fontana Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology Circolo University Hospital, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese
  • P Castelli Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Morphological Sciences, Circolo University Hospital, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v12i2.13653

Keywords:

Endograft dislocation, endograft migration

Abstract

Background
Endograft dislocation in thoracic aorta has not been widely studied.

Objectives
The purpose of this study is to analyze the incidence and predisposing factor in a single centre experience after 117 procedures.

Method
Between November 2000 and December 2011, all consecutive patients undergoing endovascular repair for descending thoracic or thoraco-abdominal aortic disease were identified. Follow-up imaging protocol included triple-phase CT-angiography at 1, 4, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. Migration was defined as proximal/ distal movements >10 mm relative to anatomical landmarks or any movement leading to symptoms or reintervention.

Result
We identified 117 patients. Mean follow-up was 32 months (range, 1-144). Overall, five (4.3%) patients with thoracic EG dislocation were identified. Dislocation was classified as collapse/infolding in 3 cases and migration in 2. Mean delay of the dislocation was 12.7 months. Only one patient developed symptoms and required an additional endograft. In the group of dislocated endografts, mean age (53 ± 20 vs. 68 ± 15, P = .032) and the diameter of the aortic lesion were lower (4.1cm ± 1.6 vs. 5.6cm ± 1.8, P = .069), and the proximal landing zone at “zones 2 and 3” were more frequently used (5 vs. 65, P = 0.81). All but one patient with collapse/infolding are still alive and doing well at a mean follow-up of 80 months.

Conclusion
Dislocation is an infrequent complication, but not so rare. Young age, small aortic diameter , and proximal sealing at the distal arch were the most important data associated with this complication.

Kathmandu University Medical Journal Vol.12(2) 2014: 97-100

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
666
PDF
566

Downloads

Published

2015-10-13

How to Cite

Piffaretti, G., Negri, S., Ferraro, S., Bossi, M., Rivolta, N., Fontana, F., & Castelli, P. (2015). Delayed Graft Dislocation After Thoracic Aortic Endovascular Repair. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 12(2), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v12i2.13653

Issue

Section

Original Articles