Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Calculus – A Single-Center Study

Authors

  • Ram Sagar Shah Department of Urology, Nobel Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Biratnagar, Nepal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6896-463X
  • Kartikesh Mishra Department of Urology, Nobel Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Biratnagar, Nepal
  • Sachidanand Sah Department of Urology, Nobel Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Biratnagar, Nepal
  • Abhishek Poudel Department of Urology, Nobel Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Biratnagar, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/jonmc.v14i1.83258

Keywords:

Staghorn calculus, operative time, urolithiasis

Abstract

Background: Staghorn calculi, either partial or complete, present a significant urological challenge. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) has become a less invasive alternative to standard PCNL (sPCNL). This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of mPCNL in treating staghorn calculi.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 26 patients at Nobel Medical College Teaching Hospital for one year. Outcomes included stone-free rate (SFR), operative time, complications, and recovery.

Results: The SFR was 84.6% (22/26), with failed cases associated with larger stones (mean 42.5 ± 3.2 mm) and higher Guy’s Scores. Mean operative time was 61.2 ± 12.4 minutes, increasing with stone size (p < 0.001). Complication rates were low, supporting mPCNL’s safety.

Conclusion: mPCNL is effective for moderate-sized staghorn stones, offering high stone clearance with minimal morbidity

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
58
PDF
68

Author Biography

Ram Sagar Shah, Department of Urology, Nobel Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Biratnagar, Nepal

Associate Professor

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Shah, R. S., Mishra, K., Sah, S., & Poudel, A. (2025). Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Calculus – A Single-Center Study. Journal of Nobel Medical College, 14(1), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.3126/jonmc.v14i1.83258

Issue

Section

Original Articles