Evidence-based Teaching Practices in Physics: An Overview on Authentic Teaching and Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/jnphyssoc.v10i1.72834Keywords:
learning constraints, class engagement, active learning, research-based instructional strategies, students’ success, teacher-centered pedagogy, learner-centered pedagogy, authentic learningAbstract
Learning is inherently a social process as outlined by the theory of constructivism. Learners construct knowledge via active participation and experience. Meaningful learning requires multiple means of engagement, representation of materials, and assessment. The current challenges in physics teaching-learning are understanding of the learning mechanism, designing of proper instructional materials, and use of student-engagement strategies that help them in long-term retention of the concepts. Pedagogical research shows that the teaching-learning process should be learner-centered where the learners will take ownership of their learning. This paper provides a review of various Research-Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS) designed to enhance physics education through learner-centered and authentic teaching practices. The literature shows that the use of RBIS fosters a more engaging learning environment, students’ deeper understanding of the material, and higher retention rates. This paper also explores the limitations of traditional lecture-based pedagogy and emphasizes the need for active learning approaches. Furthermore, it addresses challenges in implementing RBIS, such as large class sizes, time constraints, instructional resource availability, and so on. Finally, we summarize our effort to disseminate the RBIS within the Nepali physicists’ community.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All right reserved. No part of this Journal may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passage in a review. The views and interpretation in this journal are those of author(s) and they are not attributable to the NPS.