Analgesic effects of intra-articular ropivacaine following arthroscopic knee surgery: Results of a double-blind, randomized controlled trial between two different doses

Authors

  • Rajdip Hazra Department of Anesthesiology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata
  • Md. Babrak Manuar Department of Anesthesiology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata
  • SM Manjunatha Department of Anesthesiology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata
  • Sisir Chakraborty Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata
  • Kaushik Ghosh Department of Medicine, Malda Medical College and Hospital, Malda, West Bengal, India
  • Rajarshi Basu Department of Pediatric Medicine, Nilratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal
  • Md. Nurejjaman Department of Anesthesiology, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata, India
  • Arun N Kumar Department of Medicine, Mysore Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka
  • SK Yathish Department of Anesthesiology, Hindu Rao Hospital and NDMC Medical College, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v6i1.9703

Keywords:

Ropivacaine, fentanyl, dexmedetomidine, analgesia, intra-articular route, arthroscopic knee surgery

Abstract

Background: Though local anesthetic agents are widely used to provide postoperative analgesia in intra-articular route, their efficacy is not accepted universally.

Objective: The present study has been conducted to compare the analgesic effects of intra-articular ropivacaine between two different doses following arthroscopic knee surgery.

Study design: Double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Total 60 patients of ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I and II, 34 male and 26 female, aged between 18 to 60 years, were randomized into 3 groups receiving 10 ml normal saline, 10 ml 0.5% ropivacaine and 10 ml 0.75% ropivacaine respectively, administered in intra-articular space at the end of operation.

Results: Ropivacaine groups had significantly delayed first post-operative rescue analgesic request with significantly lesser requirement of rescue analgesia in first 24 hours (p<0.001 in both cases). Except 6th post-operative hours, ropivacaine groups also showed significantly less VAS scores (Visual Analogue Scale) up to 12 hours post-operatively (p<0.05).

Conclusion: In our double-blinded randomized controlled trial, administration of intra-articular 0.75% ropivacaine showed superior analgesic efficacy following arthroscopic knee surgery. Further, larger trials are needed to confirm our findings.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v6i1.9703

Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.6(1) 2015 81-86

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
742
PDF
981

Downloads

Published

2014-07-25

How to Cite

Hazra, R., Manuar, M. B., Manjunatha, S., Chakraborty, S., Ghosh, K., Basu, R., Nurejjaman, M., Kumar, A. N., & Yathish, S. (2014). Analgesic effects of intra-articular ropivacaine following arthroscopic knee surgery: Results of a double-blind, randomized controlled trial between two different doses. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 6(1), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v6i1.9703

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2015)

Section

Original Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).