Clinical experiences with robotic computed tomography-guided interventions: A comparison with manual technique
Keywords:
Volume CT dose index; Dose-length product; Robot-assisted biopsy; Computed tomography-guided procedures; MAXIO; Radiation doseAbstract
Background: Image-guided biopsies have become standard practice; however, challenges such as multiple punctures and re-attempts can complicate procedures. The introduction of robotic guidance systems, such as MAXIO offers a potential solution for improving planning and navigation. This study evaluated the efficacy of the MAXIO needle-guiding robotic device in computed tomography (CT)-guided interventions compared with conventional manual techniques.
Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the MAXIO robotic system for CT-guided biopsies at the Barnard Institute of Radiology and compare it with the conventional manual technique.
Materials and Methods: A total of sixty patients who underwent CT-guided biopsies were retrospectively divided into two groups: Group A (manual procedure) and Group B (robot-assisted procedure). The MAXIO device was utilized in combination with a Siemens 32-slice CT scanner for robot-assisted biopsies. Key parameters analyzed between the two groups included the volume CT dose index, dose-length product (DLP), target location, target depth, target size, distance from the entry point, needle angulation, procedural time, number of punctures, complications, and re-biopsy rates.
Results: Significant differences were found between the two groups in the number of punctures (p = 0.002), DLP (p = 0.0001), and degree of needle angulation (p = 0.0002), with the robotic technique demonstrating a better performance. Although the procedural time was reduced in the robotic group, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.104). Other assessed parameters, such as complications and rebiopsy rates, showed no significant differences.
Conclusion: Robotic-assisted CT-guided procedures using the MAXIO system showed improved diagnostic accuracy and safety, with reductions in radiation dose, needle manipulations, and punctures, compared to conventional manual techniques.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
