Outcome of delayed versus immediate casting on spasticity of lower limb muscles in cerebral palsy post-botulinum toxin injection

Authors

  • Suraj Kumar Choudhary K Postgraduate Resident, Department of Orthopedics, BIRRD (T) Hospital, Sri Padmavathi Medical College for Women - SVIMS, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1749-2443
  • Naveen Babu T Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, BIRRD (T) Hospital, Sri Padmavathi Medical College for Women - SVIMS, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9007-9298
  • Susmith K Postgraduate Resident, Department of Orthopedics, BIRRD (T) Hospital, Sri Padmavathi Medical College for Women - SVIMS, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6597-8724
  • Naveen Kumar P Postgraduate Resident, Department of Orthopedics, BIRRD (T) Hospital, Sri Padmavathi Medical College for Women - SVIMS, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2202-6332
  • Jagadesh G Professor, Department of Orthopedics, BIRRD (T) Hospital, Sri Padmavathi Medical College for Women - SVIMS, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0687-752X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i1.57403

Keywords:

Cerebral palsy; Botulinum toxin; Delayed versus immediate casting; EVGS

Abstract

Background: Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) is widely used to treat spasticity in children. The optimal strategy for the combined treatment of casting and BTX-A injections is not known. This prospective study is conducted to know the functional outcome of immediate versus delayed casting post-BTX-A injection in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare delayed versus immediate casting as an adjunct to botulinum toxin therapy for spasticity of lower limb muscles in CP. The objectives of the study are to test the hypothesis that delayed casting is superior to immediate casting post-botulinum toxin injection and to know the feasibility of using the Edinburgh visual gait score (EVGS) as a single qualitative and quantitative outcome measure.

Materials and Methods: A prospective study is conducted to compare immediate casting with delayed casting post-botulinum toxin injection to spastic lower limb muscles in patients with CP from July 2018 to February 2019. Inclusion criteria: A diagnosis of CP with associated spastic monoplegia, diplegia, or hemiplegia with aided or unaided ambulation. Exclusion criteria: History of orthopedic surgery in the preceding 12 months; selective dorsal rhizotomy; mixed CP; ataxia; athetosis; non-ambulatory subjects.

Results: The botulinum toxin injection + delayed POP casting group fared better in terms of clinical and functional outcome (as shown by improved EVGS scores) in our study.

Conclusion: There is a clear benefit in delaying casting after the injection of Botulinum toxin in the recurrence of spasticity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
117
PDF
199

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

How to Cite

Suraj Kumar Choudhary K, Naveen Babu T, Susmith K, Naveen Kumar P, & Jagadesh G. (2024). Outcome of delayed versus immediate casting on spasticity of lower limb muscles in cerebral palsy post-botulinum toxin injection. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 15(1), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i1.57403

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).