Diagnostic accuracy of f18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in the evaluation of carcinoma of unknown primary: A single-center study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v14i5.51774Keywords:
Carcinoma of unknown primary; Positron emission tomography; FDG PET; Diagnostic accuracyAbstract
Background: The term carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is not a single disease entity that it can be explicated as the recognition of metastasized tumor, in which the primary origin of the malignancy from an organ or site remains occult. The term refers to a clinical disorder that revolves around and represents a diversified metastatic tumor group, for whom the diagnostic investigations are unable to pinpoint the primary site of the tumor, comprising extensive radiological techniques, invasive endoscopic procedures, and histopathology, many which fail to diagnose the primary site.
Aims and Objectives: The study was conducted to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18 labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT) in the evaluation of CUP. The secondary objective of the study was to identify rate of the primary malignancies localized on 18F-FDG PET-CT that presents as CUP in local settings.
Materials and Methods: The prospective and cross-sectional study included patients with CUP who underwent 18F-FDG PET-CT scans between October 2021 and February 2022. The primary site localized on 18F-FDG PET-CT was confirmed through biopsy and histology. False-negative and false-positive patients were ascertained through biopsy and/or follow-up of 6 months.
Results: Of a total of 63 patients, 57.1% were male, while 42.9% were female with a mean age of 56.27 years. The overall detection rate of primary tumor (PT) site on 18F-FDG PET-CT was 88.8%. Abnormal sites and indicative of primary malignant tumor were correctly detected in 79.36% that were truly positive proven on biopsy. False-negative rate of scan was 4.76%, though malignancy was proven through other investigations or follow-up, while 6.36% had true negative and 9.52% showed false-positive results on the scan. In this study, the calculated diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET-CT identified as 85.7%, sensitivity 94%, specificity 40%, positive predictive value 89.2%, and negative predictive value 57.1%.
Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET-CT demonstrated high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy ascertaining the PT site in patients with CUP in our study population.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).