Thoracic segmental spinal anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a case of birt-hogg-dube syndrome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v14i3.46763Keywords:
Birt-hogg-dube Syndrome; Laparoscopy; Pneumothorax; Thoracic segmental spinalAbstract
Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome is an extremely rare genetic disorder featuring multiple lung cyst or bulla which lead to recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses a significant challenge in such cases from anesthetic point of view. Thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia (TSS) is a relatively new and beneficial alternative to general anesthesia to avoid post-operative complications. In this report, we used thoracic segmental spinal successfully in a known case of Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome to avoid post-operative pneumothorax and discussed the technique and anatomical and physiological consequences. We can conclude that thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia can be used safely and successfully in laparoscopic cholecystectomy specially in cases where general anesthesia is better avoided as in Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).