Comparative study of sonographic measurement of PRE-E/E-VC ratio versus Hyomental distance ratio to correlate Cormack–Lehane grading for airway assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v13i9.43064Keywords:
Cormack–Lehane grading; Epiglottis vocal cord distance; Hyomental distance; Pre-epiglottic depth; UltrasoundAbstract
Background: Predicting a difficult airway preoperatively overcomes the hurdles of unanticipated difficult airway management. Cormack–Lehane grading (CL Grading) best describes the view of larynx. However, direct laryngoscopy cannot be used to predict difficult airway for patients undergoing intubation for the 1st time. On the other hand, ultrasound is a safe and painless procedure. This study was done to correlate airway ultrasound findings with CL Grading by direct laryngoscopy. The patients selected were undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia.
Aims and Objectives: The aims of the present study were to correlate the ultrasound view of the airway with the Cormack–Lehane classification by direct laryngoscopy.
Materials and Methods: A group of 94 patients, aged 18–60 years, ASA I/II were selected who underwent elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia requiring intubation by direct laryngoscopy. Pre-epiglottic (PRE-E) depth and epiglottic vocal distance (E-VC) were measured along with hyomental distance ratio (HMDR) by ultrasound. The ultrasound parameters were then compared with CL Grading during laryngoscopy.
Results: The PRE-E depth/epiglottic vocal cord distance correlated better than hyomental distance ratio in predicting CL Grading (P=0.000).
Conclusion: The PRE-E/E-VC ratio was a better predictor of CL Grading than the HMDR.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).