Modified Delphi in adapting a tool to assess the level of knowledge and practice on adult enteral nutrition therapy among nurses

Authors

  • Piyumi L Weerawardhana 1. Lecturer (Probationary), Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Werahera 2. MPhil Student, Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Graduate Studies https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0961-2711
  • Lalitha Meegoda MKD Senior Lecturer, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9743-7393
  • Sampatha E Goonewardena Consultant Community Physician/Professor in Community Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3368-7959

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v13i5.42806

Keywords:

Critical care, Delphi technique, Enteral feeding, Knowledge, Nurses

Abstract

Background: Enteral nutrition (EN) is the preferred method of nutritional administration for critically ill patients according to the world’s standards. Nurses have a key role in delivering EN and assessing nurses’ knowledge and practice on this, are crucial for maintaining quality nursing care.

Aims and Objectives: This study was to utilize modified Delphi in adapting a tool to assess the level of knowledge and practice on adult EN therapy among nurses in Sri Lanka.

Materials and Methods: A three-round modified Delphi technique (DT) was employed in adapting a research tool to assess nurses’ knowledge and practice according to the nursing and EN guidelines in Sri Lanka. The questionnaire included 34 knowledge assessment items and 41 observational items to assess practice. Eight subject experts were purposively selected to rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale under three subheadings. Consensus defined at 80% agreement and mean ≥3. Mean value <3 was considered for suggested modifications. Experts participated in a final meeting in round 3 to finalize the tool.

Results: Response rate was 100% throughout the process. During round 1, 13/34 knowledge items were modified, two were removed, and one item was added. In round 2, four items were modified, and one was removed. From the observational items, 40/41 achieved consensus, one was modified, and a new one was added in round one. One was modified in round 2. All achieved consensus by round three. The final tool contained 32 knowledge items and 42 observational items with test-retest reliability correlations ranging from 0.99 to 0.95.

Conclusion: Modified DT was appropriate in achieving judgmental validity through experts’ consensus in adapting a research tool to assess nurses’ knowledge and practices on EN therapy for adult critically ill patients in Sri Lanka.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
173
PDF
219

Downloads

Published

2022-05-03

How to Cite

Weerawardhana, P. L., Lalitha Meegoda MKD, & Sampatha E Goonewardena. (2022). Modified Delphi in adapting a tool to assess the level of knowledge and practice on adult enteral nutrition therapy among nurses. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 13(5), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v13i5.42806

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 5 (2022)

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).