A study on oral clonidine vis a vis intravenous lignocaine for attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation

Authors

  • Sankar Roy Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, R.G Kar Medical College and Hospital Berhampore, West Bengal, India
  • Bidyut Bikas Gharami Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, R.G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
  • Paramita Pandit Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal, India
  • Arunava Biswas Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Coochbehar Government Medical College and Hospital, Coochbehar, West Bengal, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9676-3410
  • Dipasri Bhattacharya Professor and Head, Department of Anesthesiology, R.G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
  • Sukanta Sen Professor and Head, Department of Pharmacology, ICARE, Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, & Dr. Bidhan Chandra Roy Hospital, Haldia, West Bengal, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8348-0251

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v12i3.31995

Keywords:

Clonidine, Lignocaine, Cannulation, Stress response, Diminution

Abstract

Background: Hemodynamic change takes place during procedures like laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation due to reflex sympathetic discharge caused by epipharyngeal and laryngopharyngeal stimulation before a surgery under general anesthesia.

Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of oral clonidine and intravenous lignocaine as premedicant to obtund the stress response due to such mandatory maneuvers.

Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, double dummy-controlled study was undertaken for 11 months at a tertiary care hospital in the eastern part of India. A total (n=100) patient aged 30 to 50 years of either sex with ASA I and II waiting for elective abdominal surgery were randomized into two equal groups. Group C (n=50) received (4μg/kg) of oral clonidine 90 minute before laryngoscopy and Group L (n=50) received 1.5 mg/kg lignocaine 3 minute before laryngoscopy as active drugs and appropriate placebos were administered as double dummy technique. Comparable demographic and baseline parameters like heart rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were recorded at various time intervals. Similar anesthesia technique applied was in both the study arm.

Result: Attenuation of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and mean arterial pressure was statistically highly significant (p<0.0001) more in Group C as compared to Group L within first vital 10 minutes of intubation.

Conclusion: Oral clonidine attenuates the stress response better than intravenous lignocaine during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with minimum adverse effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
240
PDF
340

Downloads

Published

2021-03-01

How to Cite

Roy, S., Gharami, B. B., Pandit, P., Biswas, A., Bhattacharya, D., & Sen, S. (2021). A study on oral clonidine vis a vis intravenous lignocaine for attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 12(3), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v12i3.31995

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2021)

Section

Original Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).